<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Pity the media buyers</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/pity-media-buyers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/pity-media-buyers/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:00:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: Stephen Newton</title><link>http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/pity-media-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link> <dc:creator>Stephen Newton</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:37:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/2006/04/pity-media-buyers.html#comment-38</guid> <description>Hi Nic&lt;BR/&gt;I think I agree with you -- like I say &#039;they&#039;re certainly not redundant and we&#039;d all do well to support them in their fight with the duopolists&#039; -- and I&#039;m sorry if that didn&#039;t come across strongly here.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Buying Google Ads isn&#039;t always as straightforward as it seems (or Google would like us to believe). It&#039;s not a very exciting view, but I think we&#039;ll always need planners and those planners that adapt to the new media will do better than does who don&#039;t.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Stephen</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nic<br
/>I think I agree with you &#8212; like I say &#8216;they&#8217;re certainly not redundant and we&#8217;d all do well to support them in their fight with the duopolists&#8217; &#8212; and I&#8217;m sorry if that didn&#8217;t come across strongly here.</p><p>Buying Google Ads isn&#8217;t always as straightforward as it seems (or Google would like us to believe). It&#8217;s not a very exciting view, but I think we&#8217;ll always need planners and those planners that adapt to the new media will do better than does who don&#8217;t.</p><p>Stephen</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Nic Mitham</title><link>http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/pity-media-buyers/comment-page-1/#comment-39</link> <dc:creator>Nic Mitham</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:13:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/2006/04/pity-media-buyers.html#comment-39</guid> <description>I think the reason Google dropped agency commission for media buyers wasn&#039;t related to the ability of a media buyer. Instead, it was more to do with the fact that their market share is so strong and Adwords is such a compelling part of the media mix that advertisers would place media buys on their sites anyway - i.e. they wouldn&#039;t need a media buyer (well, actually a media planner) to make the recommendation.&lt;BR/&gt;What are your views on media planners?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the reason Google dropped agency commission for media buyers wasn&#8217;t related to the ability of a media buyer. Instead, it was more to do with the fact that their market share is so strong and Adwords is such a compelling part of the media mix that advertisers would place media buys on their sites anyway &#8211; i.e. they wouldn&#8217;t need a media buyer (well, actually a media planner) to make the recommendation.<br
/>What are your views on media planners?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.119 seconds using disk
Object Caching 201/207 objects using disk

Served from: www.pr-consultant.co.uk @ 2012-02-08 21:10:55 -->
