<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Chrome poster campaign: advertising online not enough</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/google-chrome-posters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/google-chrome-posters/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:00:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: Dara Bell</title><link>http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/google-chrome-posters/comment-page-1/#comment-41754</link> <dc:creator>Dara Bell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:19:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/?p=769#comment-41754</guid> <description>It is strange Chrome.  I saw this poster under a bridge, seriously that is where it was,guess where near my local Lidel. The shabby end of town.I think why not advertise it on google somewhere, that would cost them zero.  I  think this is the challenge for Google.  This  is my favourite subject is that they are growing like MacDonalds in the late 1970s or early 80s.  The pace is manic and they are making too many advertising mistakes.I am quite a postive person but I find some multi-national companies make very amateur decisions sometimes.  The budget of advertising went mostly into launching Wave but they chose to hype Buzz.  Each launch needs (product launch) to be done with the greatest impact, passion and cost effectiveness with regards the Chrome launch.Showing you my positivity, I suggest these are some of the most innovative, well designed products and they are not hitting the target market the way apple products hit the intended market.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is strange Chrome.  I saw this poster under a bridge, seriously that is where it was,guess where near my local Lidel. The shabby end of town.</p><p>I think why not advertise it on google somewhere, that would cost them zero.  I  think this is the challenge for Google.  This  is my favourite subject is that they are growing like MacDonalds in the late 1970s or early 80s.  The pace is manic and they are making too many advertising mistakes.</p><p>I am quite a postive person but I find some multi-national companies make very amateur decisions sometimes.  The budget of advertising went mostly into launching Wave but they chose to hype Buzz.  Each launch needs (product launch) to be done with the greatest impact, passion and cost effectiveness with regards the Chrome launch.</p><p>Showing you my positivity, I suggest these are some of the most innovative, well designed products and they are not hitting the target market the way apple products hit the intended market.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Steve Barker</title><link>http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/google-chrome-posters/comment-page-1/#comment-39961</link> <dc:creator>Steve Barker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 17:01:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/?p=769#comment-39961</guid> <description>I am a FreeBSD and Linux user. I fail to get excited about Chrome because after being available for a year on Windows it is still only available as a Beta on Mac and Linux. Hardly the browser for &quot;Everyone&quot; as advertised.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a FreeBSD and Linux user. I fail to get excited about Chrome because after being available for a year on Windows it is still only available as a Beta on Mac and Linux. Hardly the browser for &#8220;Everyone&#8221; as advertised.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/8 queries in 0.034 seconds using disk
Object Caching 202/205 objects using disk

Served from: www.pr-consultant.co.uk @ 2012-02-08 21:35:35 -->
