<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weber Shandwick &#8216;bitesize&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/bitesize-weber-shandwick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/bitesize-weber-shandwick/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:28:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Hamer</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/bitesize-weber-shandwick/comment-page-1/#comment-40275</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Hamer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/?p=588#comment-40275</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve now stopped talking to companies of a certain size, they really do take up too much time and you can tell when they have little or no budget. And one-off release do little to boost sales so you thne find that the one-off client then badmouths PR.

A would-be client even came back to us the other day, nine months after we originally saw them and said they liked what we offered but could we work for them for £150-£200 a month.

PR does give a great insight into how not to launch a business. It&#039;s remarkable how many people come to us without having factored marketing etc into their business plan, or if they have they have spent it - usually on a Blackeberry or laptop so they look the part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve now stopped talking to companies of a certain size, they really do take up too much time and you can tell when they have little or no budget. And one-off release do little to boost sales so you thne find that the one-off client then badmouths PR.</p>
<p>A would-be client even came back to us the other day, nine months after we originally saw them and said they liked what we offered but could we work for them for £150-£200 a month.</p>
<p>PR does give a great insight into how not to launch a business. It&#8217;s remarkable how many people come to us without having factored marketing etc into their business plan, or if they have they have spent it &#8211; usually on a Blackeberry or laptop so they look the part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Bray</title>
		<link>http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/bitesize-weber-shandwick/comment-page-1/#comment-32049</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Bray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/?p=588#comment-32049</guid>
		<description>This is nothing new, but we need to be careful as PR pros not to appear overly protective about this and other &#039;budget PR&#039; offerings. The commercial reality is that PR agencies are twitchy and will seek to generate work wherever possible.

Big agencies have big overheads and it&#039;s clear that they&#039;ll take a hit on usual day rates in order to maintain volume and subsidise their wage bills and office leases. But it&#039;s going to be loss leading and therefore not sustainable longer term.

My take on this is that it is a flash in the pan. Anyone taking up bitesize PR clearly isn&#039;t serious about proper PR. They probably aren&#039;t the sort of organisation that would normally engage a PR company, though perhaps freelancers and single handed PRs should be wary of this new development in their market place at this time.

As for the damage to our profession, I suspect it will be minimal. If anything, it will serve to help us to explain to non PR people &#039;how it shouldn&#039;t be done&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nothing new, but we need to be careful as PR pros not to appear overly protective about this and other &#8216;budget PR&#8217; offerings. The commercial reality is that PR agencies are twitchy and will seek to generate work wherever possible.</p>
<p>Big agencies have big overheads and it&#8217;s clear that they&#8217;ll take a hit on usual day rates in order to maintain volume and subsidise their wage bills and office leases. But it&#8217;s going to be loss leading and therefore not sustainable longer term.</p>
<p>My take on this is that it is a flash in the pan. Anyone taking up bitesize PR clearly isn&#8217;t serious about proper PR. They probably aren&#8217;t the sort of organisation that would normally engage a PR company, though perhaps freelancers and single handed PRs should be wary of this new development in their market place at this time.</p>
<p>As for the damage to our profession, I suspect it will be minimal. If anything, it will serve to help us to explain to non PR people &#8216;how it shouldn&#8217;t be done&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
