<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Weber Shandwick &#8216;bitesize&#8217;</title> <atom:link href="http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/bitesize-weber-shandwick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/bitesize-weber-shandwick/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 22:00:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: Richard Hamer</title><link>http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/bitesize-weber-shandwick/comment-page-1/#comment-40275</link> <dc:creator>Richard Hamer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:07:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/?p=588#comment-40275</guid> <description>We&#039;ve now stopped talking to companies of a certain size, they really do take up too much time and you can tell when they have little or no budget. And one-off release do little to boost sales so you thne find that the one-off client then badmouths PR.A would-be client even came back to us the other day, nine months after we originally saw them and said they liked what we offered but could we work for them for £150-£200 a month.PR does give a great insight into how not to launch a business. It&#039;s remarkable how many people come to us without having factored marketing etc into their business plan, or if they have they have spent it - usually on a Blackeberry or laptop so they look the part.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve now stopped talking to companies of a certain size, they really do take up too much time and you can tell when they have little or no budget. And one-off release do little to boost sales so you thne find that the one-off client then badmouths PR.</p><p>A would-be client even came back to us the other day, nine months after we originally saw them and said they liked what we offered but could we work for them for £150-£200 a month.</p><p>PR does give a great insight into how not to launch a business. It&#8217;s remarkable how many people come to us without having factored marketing etc into their business plan, or if they have they have spent it &#8211; usually on a Blackeberry or laptop so they look the part.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephen Bray</title><link>http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/bitesize-weber-shandwick/comment-page-1/#comment-32049</link> <dc:creator>Stephen Bray</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:46:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.pr-consultant.co.uk/?p=588#comment-32049</guid> <description>This is nothing new, but we need to be careful as PR pros not to appear overly protective about this and other &#039;budget PR&#039; offerings. The commercial reality is that PR agencies are twitchy and will seek to generate work wherever possible.Big agencies have big overheads and it&#039;s clear that they&#039;ll take a hit on usual day rates in order to maintain volume and subsidise their wage bills and office leases. But it&#039;s going to be loss leading and therefore not sustainable longer term.My take on this is that it is a flash in the pan. Anyone taking up bitesize PR clearly isn&#039;t serious about proper PR. They probably aren&#039;t the sort of organisation that would normally engage a PR company, though perhaps freelancers and single handed PRs should be wary of this new development in their market place at this time.As for the damage to our profession, I suspect it will be minimal. If anything, it will serve to help us to explain to non PR people &#039;how it shouldn&#039;t be done&#039;.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is nothing new, but we need to be careful as PR pros not to appear overly protective about this and other &#8216;budget PR&#8217; offerings. The commercial reality is that PR agencies are twitchy and will seek to generate work wherever possible.</p><p>Big agencies have big overheads and it&#8217;s clear that they&#8217;ll take a hit on usual day rates in order to maintain volume and subsidise their wage bills and office leases. But it&#8217;s going to be loss leading and therefore not sustainable longer term.</p><p>My take on this is that it is a flash in the pan. Anyone taking up bitesize PR clearly isn&#8217;t serious about proper PR. They probably aren&#8217;t the sort of organisation that would normally engage a PR company, though perhaps freelancers and single handed PRs should be wary of this new development in their market place at this time.</p><p>As for the damage to our profession, I suspect it will be minimal. If anything, it will serve to help us to explain to non PR people &#8216;how it shouldn&#8217;t be done&#8217;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/8 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk
Object Caching 203/205 objects using disk

Served from: www.pr-consultant.co.uk @ 2012-02-08 21:59:24 -->
